Measuring Fair Value of Identifiable Assets and Liabilities

16.4 Measuring Fair Value of Identifiable Assets and Liabilities

In the context of business combinations, measuring the fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities is a critical component of the acquisition method of accounting. This process involves determining the market-based value of tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction. Understanding how to accurately measure fair value is essential for preparing consolidated financial statements that reflect the true economic impact of a business combination. This section will guide you through the principles, methodologies, and practical applications of fair value measurement, providing insights that are crucial for your success in the Canadian Accounting Exams.

Understanding Fair Value Measurement

Fair Value Definition: According to IFRS 13, fair value is defined as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” This definition emphasizes the market-based nature of fair value, focusing on the perspective of market participants rather than the entity-specific perspective.

Key Concepts:

• Market Participants: These are buyers and sellers in the principal (or most advantageous) market for the asset or liability who are independent, knowledgeable, and willing to transact.
• Orderly Transaction: This refers to a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period before the measurement date, allowing for usual and customary marketing activities.
• Measurement Date: The date at which the fair value measurement is determined, typically the acquisition date in a business combination.

Fair Value Hierarchy

The fair value hierarchy categorizes the inputs used in valuation techniques into three levels:

1. Level 1 Inputs: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date.
2. Level 2 Inputs: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
3. Level 3 Inputs: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, reflecting the entity’s own assumptions about what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Valuation Techniques

To measure fair value, entities use one or more of the following valuation techniques:

• Market Approach: Uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
• Cost Approach: Reflects the amount that would be required currently to replace the service capacity of an asset (often referred to as current replacement cost).
• Income Approach: Converts future amounts (e.g., cash flows or income and expenses) to a single current (discounted) amount. The fair value measurement is determined on the basis of the value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts.

Measuring Fair Value of Identifiable Assets

Tangible Assets

1. Property, Plant, and Equipment (PPE):

   • Valuation Method: Typically valued using the market approach or cost approach.
   • Example: A manufacturing plant might be valued based on recent sales of similar facilities in the area (market approach) or the cost to replace the plant with a similar one adjusted for depreciation (cost approach).

2. Inventory:

   • Valuation Method: Generally valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value, but in a business combination, fair value is determined based on the selling price in the ordinary course of business less costs to complete and sell.
   • Example: Finished goods inventory might be valued at the expected selling price minus any costs to complete the sale.

Intangible Assets

1. Patents and Trademarks:

   • Valuation Method: Often valued using the income approach, considering the present value of expected future cash flows generated by the asset.
   • Example: A patented technology might be valued based on the projected income it will generate over its remaining useful life.

2. Customer Relationships:

   • Valuation Method: Typically valued using the income approach, considering the expected future cash flows from existing customer relationships.
   • Example: A customer list might be valued based on the expected revenue from repeat business with current customers.

3. Brand Names:

   • Valuation Method: Can be valued using the market approach if comparable brand transactions exist or the income approach based on expected future earnings.
   • Example: A well-known brand might be valued based on the premium it commands in the market compared to generic products.

Measuring Fair Value of Liabilities

1. Debt Obligations:

   • Valuation Method: Generally valued using the market approach if there is an active market for similar debt or the income approach using a discounted cash flow analysis.
   • Example: A bond might be valued based on the current market yield for similar bonds.

2. Contingent Liabilities:

   • Valuation Method: Often valued using the income approach, considering the probability-weighted expected cash flows.
   • Example: A lawsuit liability might be valued based on the expected settlement amount and the probability of different outcomes.

3. Lease Obligations:

   • Valuation Method: Typically valued using the income approach, considering the present value of future lease payments.
   • Example: A lease liability might be valued based on the discounted cash flows of future lease payments.

Practical Examples and Case Studies

Example 1: Valuation of a Manufacturing Plant

A company acquires a manufacturing plant as part of a business combination. The plant is located in an industrial area with several recent sales of similar facilities. The fair value of the plant is determined using the market approach by comparing it to the sale prices of similar plants, adjusted for differences in size, age, and condition.

Example 2: Valuation of a Customer List

A company acquires a competitor and inherits a valuable customer list. The fair value of the customer list is determined using the income approach by estimating the future cash flows from repeat business with these customers and discounting them to present value using an appropriate discount rate.

Regulatory Considerations

In Canada, fair value measurement is governed by IFRS 13, which provides a framework for measuring fair value and requires disclosures about fair value measurements. It is important to ensure compliance with these standards when preparing consolidated financial statements.

Challenges and Best Practices

Challenges:

• Subjectivity in Level 3 Inputs: Valuations using unobservable inputs can be subjective and require significant judgment.
• Market Volatility: Changes in market conditions can affect fair value measurements, requiring frequent updates and reassessments.

Best Practices:

• Use Multiple Valuation Techniques: Where possible, use more than one valuation technique to cross-verify results.
• Document Assumptions and Inputs: Maintain thorough documentation of the assumptions and inputs used in fair value measurements to support the valuation process.
• Engage Valuation Experts: Consider engaging professional valuation experts for complex or significant assets and liabilities.

Exam Tips

• Understand the Fair Value Hierarchy: Be familiar with the three levels of inputs and how they apply to different types of assets and liabilities.
• Practice Valuation Techniques: Work through examples using the market, cost, and income approaches to reinforce your understanding.
• Focus on Disclosure Requirements: Be aware of the disclosure requirements under IFRS 13, as these are commonly tested on exams.

Summary

Measuring the fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities is a critical aspect of accounting for business combinations. By understanding the principles of fair value measurement, applying appropriate valuation techniques, and adhering to regulatory standards, you can ensure accurate and reliable financial reporting. This knowledge is not only essential for your success in the Canadian Accounting Exams but also for your future career in accounting.

Ready to Test Your Knowledge?