Types of Engagements in Audit and Assurance

10.2.1 Types of Engagements

In the realm of audit and assurance, understanding the different types of engagements is crucial for any aspiring Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA). These engagements vary in terms of the level of assurance provided, the nature of the work performed, and the standards applied. This section will delve into the primary types of assurance engagements, including audits, reviews, and compilations, with a focus on their application within the Canadian accounting framework.

Understanding Assurance Engagements

Assurance engagements are professional services provided by accountants to enhance the reliability of information for decision-makers. These engagements are governed by standards set by professional bodies, such as CPA Canada, and are designed to provide varying levels of assurance on the information being examined.

Levels of Assurance

1. Reasonable Assurance: This is the highest level of assurance provided by an audit engagement. It involves a comprehensive examination of financial statements and results in an auditor’s opinion on whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

2. Limited Assurance: Provided by review engagements, limited assurance involves less extensive procedures than an audit and results in a conclusion on whether anything has come to the auditor’s attention that causes them to believe the financial statements are not prepared in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.

3. No Assurance: Compilation engagements fall under this category, where the accountant compiles financial information into financial statements without providing any assurance on their accuracy or completeness.

Types of Assurance Engagements

1. Audit Engagements

Audit engagements are designed to provide a high level of assurance on the financial statements of an entity. They involve a systematic process of objectively obtaining and evaluating evidence regarding assertions about economic actions and events to ascertain the degree of correspondence between those assertions and established criteria.

Key Features of Audit Engagements:

• Objective: To express an opinion on whether the financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.
• Standards: Governed by the Canadian Auditing Standards (CAS).
• Procedures: Include risk assessment, testing of internal controls, substantive testing, and analytical procedures.
• Outcome: An audit report that includes the auditor’s opinion.

Example: A public company in Canada is required to have its financial statements audited annually to provide stakeholders with confidence in the reported financial performance and position.

2. Review Engagements

Review engagements provide a moderate level of assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement. The procedures involved are less extensive than those in an audit and primarily consist of inquiries and analytical procedures.

Key Features of Review Engagements:

• Objective: To provide limited assurance that the financial statements are in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.
• Standards: Governed by the Canadian Standard on Review Engagements (CSRE).
• Procedures: Primarily inquiries of management and analytical procedures.
• Outcome: A review report that provides a conclusion on the financial statements.

Example: A private company may opt for a review engagement to satisfy the requirements of lenders or other stakeholders who do not require a full audit.

3. Compilation Engagements

Compilation engagements involve the preparation of financial statements based on information provided by management. The accountant does not provide any assurance on the financial statements.

Key Features of Compilation Engagements:

• Objective: To assist management in presenting financial information in the form of financial statements.
• Standards: Governed by the Compilation Engagements standard.
• Procedures: Involves assembling financial data into a financial statement format without verifying the accuracy or completeness of the information.
• Outcome: A compilation report that states no assurance is provided.

Example: Small businesses often use compilation engagements to prepare financial statements for internal use or tax filing purposes.

Practical Applications and Considerations

Regulatory Requirements

In Canada, the type of engagement required often depends on regulatory requirements, the needs of stakeholders, and the size and nature of the entity. Publicly accountable enterprises are typically required to have audits, while private companies may choose between audits, reviews, or compilations based on their specific circumstances.

Choosing the Right Engagement

When deciding on the type of engagement, entities must consider factors such as cost, the level of assurance required, and stakeholder expectations. For instance, a company seeking to secure financing might opt for a review engagement if a full audit is not necessary but some level of assurance is desired.

Case Study: Transition from Review to Audit

Consider a mid-sized manufacturing company that initially opted for a review engagement to satisfy its bank’s requirements. As the company grew and sought to attract new investors, the need for more comprehensive assurance led to a transition to an audit engagement. This shift provided potential investors with greater confidence in the financial statements, facilitating the company’s expansion plans.

Challenges and Best Practices

Common Challenges

• Understanding Stakeholder Needs: Determining the appropriate level of assurance can be challenging, especially when balancing cost and stakeholder expectations.
• Compliance with Standards: Ensuring compliance with the relevant standards for each type of engagement requires a thorough understanding of the applicable guidelines and regulations.

Best Practices

• Engage with Stakeholders: Regular communication with stakeholders can help clarify their assurance needs and expectations.
• Stay Informed: Keeping up-to-date with changes in standards and regulations is crucial for maintaining compliance and providing quality assurance services.
• Professional Judgment: Applying professional judgment is essential in determining the scope and nature of procedures for each type of engagement.

Conclusion

Understanding the different types of assurance engagements is fundamental for CPA candidates and practicing accountants. Each type of engagement serves a specific purpose and provides varying levels of assurance, tailored to meet the needs of different stakeholders. By mastering the intricacies of audits, reviews, and compilations, you will be well-equipped to provide valuable assurance services in your professional career.

Ready to Test Your Knowledge?

Practice 10 Essential CPA Exam Questions to Master Your Certification